Performance#
Version 1.1.0#
This version introduces significant performance improvements through TensorRT (TRT) optimization, while maintaining the same accuracy as version 1.0.0. The optimization focuses on:
Enhanced inference speed through TensorRT engine optimization
Improved memory utilization during inference
Maintained accuracy metrics compared to version 1.0.0
Recommended System Requirements#
Refer to Supported Hardware for requirements.
Performance Benchmarks#
The following are performance benchmarks comparing OpenFold2 versions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0.
Structure prediction performance is mostly dependent on GPU capability and memory. If you find structure prediction to be a bottleneck, consider using a higher memory device.
The time required for structure prediction grows with sequence length.
The time required for structure prediction grows with the total number of sequences in the alignments.
Below are benchmark times, measured for each input chain, in sequential execution on a single ‘NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3’ device.
Performance Comparison (Time in seconds)#
protein chain id |
7WBN_A |
7ONG_A |
7ZHT_A |
7Y4I_A |
---|---|---|---|---|
sequence length |
98 |
304 |
562 |
914 |
Version 1.0.0 |
5.31 |
10.2 |
19.6 |
41.2 |
Version 1.1.0 |
4.33 |
7.73 |
19.36 |
41.19 |
Speedup |
1.23x |
1.32x |
1.01x |
1.00x |
Accuracy Metrics#
Metric |
Version 1.0.0 |
Version 1.1.0 |
---|---|---|
CADS |
0.7443 |
0.6889 |
LDDT |
0.8618 |
0.775 |
STRIDE |
0.8672 |
0.8464 |
MP |
4.2445 |
4.263 |
Version 1.0.0#
Performance will also vary significantly depending on:
The type of NVIDIA GPUs that are attached and available to the NIM
The CPU type
System RAM available
The following section details some performance expectations and provides general tips. These are not meant to be indicative of expected performance and performance on your system will vary from these values.
Recommended System Requirements#
Refer to Supported Hardware for requirements.
Performance Benchmarks#
The following are performance benchmarks for OpenFold2 version 1.0.0.
Structure prediction performance is mostly dependent on GPU capability and memory. If you find structure prediction to be a bottleneck, consider using a higher memory device.
The time required for structure prediction grows with sequence length.
The time required for structure prediction grows with the total number of sequences in the alignments.
Below are benchmark times, measured for each input chain, in sequential execution on a single ‘NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3’ device.
The average value of LDDT-CA, for these protein chains, averaged over 2 runs, is 0.86.
protein chain id |
7WBN_A |
7ONG_A |
7ZHT_A |
7Y4I_A |
---|---|---|---|---|
sequence length |
98 |
304 |
562 |
914 |
time* |
5.31 |
10.2 |
19.6 |
41.2 |
*time to load parameter sets, compute features, and do forward pass, averaged over the 5 models [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Version 1.0.0 Configuration#
algo feature / parameter |
setting |
---|---|
use_templates |
False |
selected_models |
[1,2,3,4,5] |
relax_prediction |
False |
deepspeed evoformer kernel |
active |
precision for deepspeed evoformer kernel |
bf16 |
precision for the rest of the model |
fp32 |