Planner DynoSim Benchmarking | NVIDIA Dynamo Documentation

This guide shows how to benchmark the Dynamo Planner against a recorded trace by running it inside DynoSim. Use it to compare agg vs disagg topologies, tune SLA targets, and study how deployment realities (engine startup time, worker counts) affect planner behavior — all without bringing up a live cluster.

For the general mechanics of DynoSim runs (input format, arrival speedup, router modes, synthetic workloads), see DynoSim Runs. This guide focuses on the --planner-config path.

1. Setup

Build

Build the Dynamo Python bindings so python -m dynamo.replay is available:

$ cd lib/bindings/python
$ .venv/bin/maturin develop --release

The --release flag is strongly recommended. DynoSim execution is largely single-threaded and CPU-bound on the mocker engine core; a debug build can be 5–10× slower, which compounds across sweep runs.

Key Planner Config Knobs

Passed as JSON via --planner-config. Uses the same schema as the live planner. The fields most relevant to benchmarking:

Field	Purpose
`mode`	`"agg"` or `"disagg"` — picks scaling strategy and required engine args.
`optimization_target`	`"sla"` uses TTFT/ITL targets; `"throughput"` uses static queue/KV thresholds.
`ttft_ms` / `itl_ms`	SLA targets in ms. Drives load-scaling decisions.
`enable_throughput_scaling`	Periodic scaling based on predicted steady-state load.
`enable_load_scaling`	Reactive scaling to short-term traffic spikes.
`throughput_adjustment_interval_seconds`	Seconds between throughput-scaling decisions.
`load_adjustment_interval_seconds`	Seconds between load-scaling decisions. Short intervals mean faster reaction but more flapping.
`pre_deployment_sweeping_mode`	`"rapid"` uses the AIC analytical model; leave unset to fall back to recorded profile data.
`prefill_engine_num_gpu` / `decode_engine_num_gpu`	GPUs per engine replica. Must be set explicitly — both default to `None`, and the simulation adapter silently treats `None` as `0`, which collapses the cumulative-GPU-hours metric in the report to zero.
`report_filename`	Output HTML filename under `./planner_reports/`.

Key Engine Arg Knobs

Passed as JSON via --extra-engine-args (agg) or --prefill-engine-args / --decode-engine-args (disagg). DynoSim uses the mocker engine, so “engine args” means the analytical perf model inputs:

Field	Purpose
`aic_backend`	Backend the analytical model should emulate, e.g. `"vllm"`, `"trtllm"`, `"sglang"`.
`aic_system`	GPU SKU for the perf model, e.g. `"h200_sxm"`, `"h100_sxm"`, `"b200"`.
`aic_model_path`	HF model identifier used by the perf model.
`aic_tp_size`	Tensor-parallel size of each engine replica.
`startup_time`	Simulated seconds between a planner scale-up decision and the new worker becoming active. Unset or `0` means workers activate instantly.

Other fields follow the standard mocker engine protocol (see DynoSim Runs).

2. Example: Agg vs Disagg On The Mooncake Agentic Trace

Download the trace:

$ mkdir -p traces/mooncake_fast25 && cd traces/mooncake_fast25
$ curl -sLO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/main/FAST25-release/traces/toolagent_trace.jsonl

Run agg (2 workers, TP=1):

$ .venv/bin/python -m dynamo.replay traces/mooncake_fast25/toolagent_trace.jsonl \
>   --planner-config '{
>     "mode": "agg",
>     "optimization_target": "sla",
>     "ttft_ms": 1500, "itl_ms": 50,
>     "enable_throughput_scaling": true, "enable_load_scaling": true,
>     "pre_deployment_sweeping_mode": "rapid",
>     "throughput_adjustment_interval_seconds": 300, "load_adjustment_interval_seconds": 10,
>     "prefill_engine_num_gpu": 1, "decode_engine_num_gpu": 1,
>     "report_filename": "dynosim_agg.html"
>   }' \
>   --extra-engine-args '{"aic_backend": "vllm", "aic_system": "h200_sxm", "aic_model_path": "nvidia/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-FP8", "aic_tp_size": 1}' \
>   --num-workers 2 --arrival-speedup-ratio 1.0

Run disagg (1P1D, TP=1):

$ .venv/bin/python -m dynamo.replay traces/mooncake_fast25/toolagent_trace.jsonl \
>   --planner-config '{
>     "mode": "disagg",
>     "optimization_target": "sla",
>     "ttft_ms": 1500, "itl_ms": 50,
>     "enable_throughput_scaling": true, "enable_load_scaling": true,
>     "pre_deployment_sweeping_mode": "rapid",
>     "throughput_adjustment_interval_seconds": 300, "load_adjustment_interval_seconds": 10,
>     "prefill_engine_num_gpu": 1, "decode_engine_num_gpu": 1,
>     "report_filename": "dynosim_disagg.html"
>   }' \
>   --prefill-engine-args '{"aic_backend": "vllm", "aic_system": "h200_sxm", "aic_model_path": "nvidia/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-FP8", "aic_tp_size": 1}' \
>   --decode-engine-args  '{"aic_backend": "vllm", "aic_system": "h200_sxm", "aic_model_path": "nvidia/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-FP8", "aic_tp_size": 1}' \
>   --num-prefill-workers 1 --num-decode-workers 1 --arrival-speedup-ratio 1.0

Each run prints the AIPerf summary table to stdout and writes an HTML diagnostics report to ./planner_reports/<report_filename>. For this trace with a long ISL and short OSL, agg is better than disagg, which gets slightly better ITL at the cost noticeably more GPU-hours.

3. Example: Cold-Start-Time Sweep

How sensitive is SLA attainment to engine startup time? Sweep startup_time from 0 to 300 seconds in 10-second steps and record TTFT/ITL/GPU-hours per run.

$ #!/usr/bin/env bash
$ set -euo pipefail
$ 
$ TRACE=traces/mooncake_fast25/toolagent_trace.jsonl
$ OUT=planner_reports/sweep_startup
$ mkdir -p "$OUT"
$ 
$ run_one() {
>   local s=$1
>   local name=$(printf "dynosim_agg_startup_%03d.html" "$s")
>   local extra
>   if [[ "$s" -eq 0 ]]; then
>     extra='{"aic_backend":"vllm","aic_system":"h200_sxm","aic_model_path":"nvidia/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-FP8","aic_tp_size":1}'
>   else
>     extra=$(printf '{"aic_backend":"vllm","aic_system":"h200_sxm","aic_model_path":"nvidia/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-FP8","aic_tp_size":1,"startup_time":%d}' "$s")
>   fi
>   .venv/bin/python -m dynamo.replay "$TRACE" \
>     --planner-config "$(printf '{"mode":"agg","optimization_target":"sla","ttft_ms":1500,"itl_ms":50,"enable_throughput_scaling":true,"enable_load_scaling":true,"pre_deployment_sweeping_mode":"rapid","throughput_adjustment_interval_seconds":300,"load_adjustment_interval_seconds":10,"prefill_engine_num_gpu":1,"decode_engine_num_gpu":1,"report_filename":"%s"}' "$name")" \
>     --extra-engine-args "$extra" \
>     --num-workers 2 --arrival-speedup-ratio 1.0 \
>     --report-json "$OUT/startup_$(printf '%03d' "$s").json" \
>     >"$OUT/startup_$(printf '%03d' "$s").log" 2>&1
> }
$ 
$ export -f run_one
$ # Run 12 sweeps in parallel; adjust -P for your machine.
$ seq 0 10 300 | xargs -n1 -P12 -I{} bash -c 'run_one "$@"' _ {}

Each run emits the AIPerf metrics table (parse TTFT / ITL avg / p90) and its HTML report (grep GPU hours: <float>). Plotting those against startup_time gives:

Planner DynoSim — startup time sweep

Observations from this sweep (agg, TTFT SLA 1,500 ms, ITL SLA 50 ms, H200-SXM, Llama-3.1-8B-FP8, TP=1):

SLA cliff near 100–120 s. Below that, the planner scales up fast enough to hold TTFT; above it, p99 TTFT diverges and the system stays perpetually backlogged.
Scaling-event count drops monotonically (42 → 8) as startup grows — long-startup runs require load planner to wait for stabilization before the next scaling decision.
ITL is less sensitive than TTFT until the queue saturates. Below the cliff, ITL rises modestly (25 → 30 ms avg); above it, p90 ITL jumps to ~200 ms as decode requests starve.