Evaluate a NeMo Gym Environment
NeMo Gym is an environment framework for agentic rollouts: a
resources-server provides the environment, an agent acts in it, and each rollout carries a
reward. If you already have a Gym environment, the Gym runner runs it and scores its reward
through agent-eval — the same AgentEvaluator and the
same result and bundle as the quickstart.
Only the runner changes.
Gym owns execution and scoring here. The runner shells out to the gym CLI and adapts the
rollout bundle into trials; GymRewardMetric surfaces Gym’s per-attempt reward.
Like the Harbor runner, this one is not zero-dependency — it shells out to the gym CLI:
- NeMo Gym, installed into its own
uvenvironment (below) - The target environment’s own dependencies — each resources-server ships its own
requirements.txt(themcqaexample needstiktoken) - Model credentials for the collector, in an
env.yaml(below)
Install Gym into its own environment and put that environment’s bin on PATH. Gym imports Ray
at module load, and nemo-platform excludes Ray by constraint, so the two generally cannot share a
virtualenv. The runner resolves gym from PATH only — there is deliberately no setting pointing at
a checkout or another venv, because this config becomes a serialized job spec when Gym runs as a
platform job, and a local path means nothing on the other side of that boundary. In a job image, the
image owns PATH and this resolves normally.
Credentials
Gym’s collector calls your model endpoint directly. It reads the credentials from an env.yaml in
the directory you run from — this SDK never reads or handles that file:
Keep it out of version control. Gym searches the working directory first, then its install root.
The dataset
A Gym dataset is a jsonl file, one row per case. Environments ship their example data inside the
nemo-gym wheel, so the bundled mcqa benchmark needs no checkout:
discover_gym_tasks turns that file into tasks — one per distinct row:
Task identity is the row’s content hash, which has two consequences worth knowing before you build a dataset:
- Duplicate rows collapse into a single task, and the runner warns. Duplicates usually mean a data problem.
- Repeating a row is not how you ask for repeated attempts. Use
num_repeats— attempts are a run-level concern, not a dataset one.
Run it
Run it from the directory holding env.yaml.
The mapping is:
- one Gym dataset → one run
- each distinct row → one task
- each attempt → one trial
So num_repeats=2 over a 5-row dataset yields 5 tasks and 10 trials.
Configuration
Anything GymRuntimeConfig does not expose can go through hydra_params, which is flattened to
Hydra’s override grammar and applied to gym env start. For the full set of knobs, see the
NeMo Gym documentation.
Read the results
Gym’s reward arrives as gym_reward.reward, and Gym’s own aggregates are imported alongside the
SDK’s under a runner.gym.* prefix — the prefix is what tells you which side computed a number:
Gym reports accuracy on a 0–100 scale where the SDK uses 0–1, so runner.gym.pass@1/accuracy
of 50.0 corresponds to a gym_reward.reward mean of 0.5. Trials, scores, and the run bundle are
otherwise read exactly as in
Reading Results.
Output directories
Each run writes to a fresh temporary directory by default. To choose one, set work_dir on the run
config:
Give every run its own. The runner refuses to reuse a directory that already holds Gym rollout
output, raising FileExistsError: Gym appends to its failures sidecar, so reusing one would mix two
runs together, and the runner raises rather than clearing a previous run’s results.
Gym’s own artifacts land in a gym_run/ subdirectory — rollouts.jsonl,
rollouts_failures.jsonl, rollouts_aggregate_metrics.json, and the materialized
gym_input.jsonl handed to collection.
How it runs Gym
The runner uses Gym’s two-step flow, which reads a dataset file directly — no split-driven data preparation and no HuggingFace downloads:
gym env start …brings up the resources-server, agent, and model servers.gym eval run --no-serve --input <dataset> …collects rollouts against them.
The dataset handed to step 2 is not your source file. The runner materializes a normalized one
into the run’s work directory, one row per requested task, with _ng_task_index stamped explicitly.
Gym honors a caller-supplied _ng_task_index and echoes it back on every rollout record, so rollouts
join back to tasks through a map the runner owns rather than a guess about Gym’s row ordering. That
is also what lets you run a subset of tasks and roll out only that subset.
Logs
Gym’s subprocess output is streamed to files in the run’s work directory — gym_env.log for startup,
and gym_eval.stdout.log / gym_eval.stderr.log for collection — and mirrored to the
nemo_evaluator_sdk.agent_eval.runtimes.gym logger at DEBUG. Startup and collection failures name
the relevant file and inline its last lines. To watch Gym’s output in your own terminal:
Submit as a platform job
A Gym runner can be submitted as a durable platform job from the live runner object, rather than described a second time as a job spec — the configuration you validated locally is the configuration that runs.
submit takes a stored taskset, so the Gym rows have to be stored first. A Gym taskset is not an
ordinary one: the job rebuilds the Gym dataset from each task, so every task must carry the row that
discover_gym_tasks split across inputs['gym_row'] and metadata['gym_row_extras']. Build the
tasks with discover_gym_tasks and store both halves:
Two things that bite here:
- Do not name the task after
task.id. It is a 64-character hex digest, already past the 63-character cap on entity names, and it may begin with a digit where a name must start with a letter. Derive a name, as above; the digest stays the task’s ownid. gym_rowrides oninputsandgym_row_extrason the task’smetadata— the field besidespec, not inside it. A task missing either is rejected job-side withtask '<id>' is missing inputs['gym_row'] and/or metadata['gym_row_extras'].
A value with no JSON form — a callable in hydra_params, say — is refused with
UnsubmittableRunnerError at submit time, rather than failing inside the transport with an error
that names neither the runner nor the field.
The returned handle is an AgentEvaluatorJobResource. Unlike a dataset-driven job it has no
get_result() or download_artifacts(), because an agent evaluation publishes agent-eval results
and a summary rather than row scores. Read the scores through
client.evaluator.agent_eval_results.
Gym jobs run on their own nmp-gym-tasks container image rather than the shared CPU task image,
because Gym requires Ray. No configuration is needed — the target selects it.
Caveats
- Per-environment dependencies are heterogeneous.
mcqaneeds onlytiktoken; other Gym environments pull intorch, COMET, a GPU, or Docker. Providing a Gym runtime with those installed is the caller’s responsibility. --no-serve --inputbypasses Gym’s data-prep — prompt templating and dataset materialization. Rows that are already complete, like the bundledexample.jsonl, are faithful; an environment whose rows need templating would need that step run first.- Service-side execution — Docker or Kubernetes, Ray provisioning — is out of scope for this SDK path. That is the evaluator plugin’s concern.