Accuracy Benchmarking

View as Markdown

Run accuracy evaluation alongside performance profiling using the --accuracy-benchmark flag.

Quick Start

$# MMLU benchmark with 5-shot prompting (chat endpoint, aligned with lighteval)
$aiperf profile Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct \
> --url http://localhost:8000 \
> --endpoint-type chat \
> --accuracy-benchmark mmlu \
> --accuracy-n-shots 5 \
> --num-requests 15000 \
> --concurrency 10 \
> --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0, "stop": ["\n"]}'
$# AIME competition math — defaults match the trt-llm benchmark recipe
$# (8-shot, chain-of-thought on, sympy-backed math grader)
$aiperf profile Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct \
> --url http://localhost:8000 \
> --endpoint-type chat \
> --accuracy-benchmark aime \
> --num-requests 30 \
> --concurrency 10 \
> --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0}'

trt-llm reference alignment

The aime benchmark is aligned with the trt-llm benchmark recipe’s DeepEval-backed AIME path (trt-llm-benchmark-recipe/src/accuracy/aime/):

  • Dataset: Maxwell-Jia/AIME_2024, train split.
  • Defaults: n_shots=8, enable_cot=True (the recipe enforces n_shots <= 8 and aiperf raises ValueError if you exceed it).
  • Prompt format: byte-equal to AIMETemplate.generate_output**Problem**: ... **Solution**: ... **Answer**: ... blocks for few-shots (Solution only when CoT is on), trailing Let's think step-by-step. after the final **Answer**:.
  • System prompt (auto-injected): "Please reason step by step, and put your final answer within \\boxed{}." This default lives in plugins.yaml under the aime benchmark’s default_system_prompt metadata. Override it with --accuracy-system-prompt 'your prompt here'. Pass --accuracy-system-prompt '' to disable injection.
  • Grader: MathGrader with _math_strip.strip_string + sympy/ latex2sympy2-extended math_equal. Requires the [accuracy] extra: uv pip install 'aiperf[accuracy]'. Without those packages installed the grader falls back to a stdlib normalize+Fraction comparison and emits a one-time warning; reference parity is only achieved with the full sympy stack.

Per-benchmark default system prompts

Benchmarkdefault_system_prompt
aimePlease reason step by step, and put your final answer within \boxed{}.
(others)none — pass via --accuracy-system-prompt if desired

The CLI’s --accuracy-system-prompt flag always wins; the per-benchmark default is only consulted when the flag is unset. An empty-string default in metadata is treated as no default (aiperf doesn’t inject a zero-length system message).

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkDefault graderDefault n-shotsSource
mmlumultiple_choice5lighteval/mmlu (57 subjects)
aimemath8Maxwell-Jia/AIME_2024 (trt-llm reference, 8-shot CoT)
hellaswagexact_match10Rowan/hellaswag (trt-llm/DeepEval reference; one few-shot per unique activity_label)
bigbenchexact_match3lukaemon/bbh (trt-llm/DeepEval reference; 27 subtasks, canonical CoT/non-CoT prompt files)
aime24lighteval_expr0HuggingFaceH4/aime_2024 (trt-llm/lighteval reference, bare problem text, expr_gold_metric)
aime25lighteval_expr0yentinglin/aime_2025 (trt-llm/lighteval reference, bare problem text, expr_gold_metric)
math_500lighteval_latex0HuggingFaceH4/MATH-500 (trt-llm/lighteval reference, gold is full solution containing \boxed{answer}, latex_gold_metric)
gpqa_diamondlighteval_gpqa0Idavidrein/gpqa subset gpqa_diamond (trt-llm/lighteval reference, simple-evals template with SHA-256-seeded deterministic A/B/C/D shuffling, gpqa_metric)
lcb_codegenerationcode_execution0livecodebench/code_generation_lite (trt-llm/lighteval reference; LCB test-case payload serialized into BenchmarkProblem.ground_truth as an orjson blob; code_execution grader runs the generated code against the bundled test cases via lighteval’s codegen_metrics)
gsm8klighteval_gsm8k0gsm8k subset main (trt-llm/lighteval reference, gsm8k_leaderboard config; prompt "Question: {question}\nAnswer:", gold is the raw answer ending in #### <number>, quasi_exact_match_gsm8k)

LiveCodeBench (lcb_codegeneration) version pinning

LiveCodeBench publishes monthly snapshots of livecodebench/code_generation_lite as HuggingFace configs (e.g. v4_v5, v6, …). The loader pins a specific subset so accuracy numbers are reproducible across runs and branches; the default is v4_v5 (the same subset lighteval’s reference LCB task treats as its base). Override at runtime via:

$export AIPERF_ACCURACY_LCB_RELEASE_TAG=v6 # or any published subset

The env var is read at every load_problems call (no module-reload needed) and is passed as the positional name arg to load_dataset("livecodebench/code_generation_lite", name, split="test", trust_remote_code=True) — the standard HF config-name selector, matching lighteval’s hf_subset= usage. trust_remote_code=True is set by the loader so LCB’s dataset-loading script can execute on datasets v4+ (which dropped the implicit-trust default); this mirrors lighteval’s reference path (get_dataset_config_names(..., trust_remote_code=True) plus trust_dataset=True on the task config). Nothing is bundled with the aiperf wheel — all subsets are fetched on-demand and cached under ~/.cache/huggingface/datasets/.

Compatibility: the positional-name API is the standard HF load_dataset shape, and the explicit trust_remote_code=True opt-in means the loader works on datasets v3 and v4+ without operator env-var fiddling. If a future LCB release renames or removes the pinned subset, the loader raises RuntimeError prefixed lcb_codegeneration: failed to load …; recover by bumping the env var:

$export AIPERF_ACCURACY_LCB_RELEASE_TAG=v6 # or whatever LCB now ships

The remap also surfaces the installed datasets version when ≥ 4 in case you’ve explicitly disabled remote-code execution at the env level (HF_DATASETS_TRUST_REMOTE_CODE=0); the safest workaround there is to install a compatible datasets:

$uv pip install 'datasets>=3.0,<4'

The error message names which condition fired (it includes the installed datasets version when ≥ 4) so operators get an actionable next step without reading the source.

CLI Flags

FlagDescriptionDefault
--accuracy-benchmarkBenchmark name (mmlu, aime, hellaswag, …)
--accuracy-tasksSpecific subtasks (e.g., MMLU subjects). Accepts comma-separated values (abstract_algebra,anatomy) or repeated flags. Omit for all.all
--accuracy-n-shotsFew-shot example count (0–32). None uses the benchmark default (e.g. MMLU=5).benchmark default
--accuracy-enable-cotEnable chain-of-thought promptingfalse
--accuracy-graderOverride default grader (multiple_choice, exact_match, …)auto
--accuracy-system-promptCustom system prompt
--accuracy-verboseShow per-problem grading detailsfalse

Endpoint Type: completions vs chat

Both endpoint types are supported. The choice affects prompt format and alignment with reference frameworks:

EndpointPrompt formatBest for
completionsSingle flat text to /v1/completionsTraditional MMLU evaluation
chatMulti-turn user/assistant messages to /v1/chat/completionsAligning with lighteval

When --endpoint-type chat is used, MMLU few-shot examples are structured as separate user/assistant message turns (matching lighteval’s PromptManager._prepare_chat_template()). The completions endpoint sends the entire prompt as a single text block.

Temperature: Must be explicitly set to 0 via --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0}' for deterministic (greedy) decoding. Most LLM servers default to temperature=1.0 when not specified, which introduces random sampling and causes run-to-run variance. lighteval defaults to temperature=0 internally.

Stop sequence: Use --extra-inputs '{"stop": ["\n"]}' to match lighteval’s MMLU behavior (stop at first newline). Can be combined with temperature: --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0, "stop": ["\n"]}'.

Concurrency: Higher concurrency is faster. --concurrency 10 or above is recommended. Minor run-to-run variance (~0.2% macro) is expected due to GPU floating-point non-determinism; this is independent of concurrency level.

num-requests: Set to at least the total number of benchmark problems (MMLU: 14,042 across 57 subjects).

Examples

$# Single subject, quick test
$aiperf profile my-model --url http://localhost:8000 \
> --endpoint-type chat \
> --accuracy-benchmark mmlu \
> --accuracy-n-shots 5 \
> --accuracy-tasks abstract_algebra \
> --num-requests 100 \
> --concurrency 10 \
> --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0, "stop": ["\n"]}'
$
$# Full MMLU (57 subjects, 14042 problems)
$aiperf profile my-model --url http://localhost:8000 \
> --endpoint-type chat \
> --accuracy-benchmark mmlu \
> --accuracy-n-shots 5 \
> --num-requests 15000 \
> --concurrency 50 \
> --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0, "stop": ["\n"]}'
$
$# Completions endpoint (traditional flat-text format)
$aiperf profile my-model --url http://localhost:8000 \
> --endpoint-type completions \
> --accuracy-benchmark mmlu \
> --accuracy-n-shots 5 \
> --num-requests 15000 \
> --concurrency 50 \
> --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0, "stop": ["\n"]}'
$
$# AIME with explicit math grader and few-shot priming
$aiperf profile my-model --url http://localhost:8000 \
> --endpoint-type chat \
> --accuracy-benchmark aime \
> --accuracy-grader math \
> --accuracy-n-shots 4 \
> --num-requests 30 \
> --concurrency 10 \
> --extra-inputs '{"temperature": 0}'

Graders

GraderSelection ruleCoverage
multiple_choiceA/B/C/D match against gold letter (lighteval ExactMatches).MMLU
mathExtract last \boxed{...}, fall back to “answer is X” / last number. Apply trt-llm strip_string normalization, then compare via math_equal (lowercase string → numeric isclose → symbolic equivalence via sympy + latex2sympy2-extended).AIME
exact_matchStub.(unused)
code_executionStub.(unused)

The math grader pipeline (aligned with trt-llm-benchmark-recipe/src/accuracy/aime/):

  1. Extract the model’s final answer by priority:
    • The contents of the last \boxed{...} in the response (canonical MATH/AIME format).
    • The tail of an “the answer is X” / “answer: X” / “final answer X” phrase, recursively re-parsed for boxed/numeric content.
    • The last numeric literal in the response.
  2. Normalize both prediction and gold via the recipe’s strip_string: linebreaks/spacing/quote-style braces collapsed, \dfrac/\tfrac\frac, \left/\right removed, \text{...} unwrapped, MathQA-derived unit tokens dropped, infinity/percent/months/dollar-sign normalization, trailing .0 decimals trimmed, simple a/b rewritten as \frac{a}{b}.
  3. Compare with math_equal (lowercase string equality → choice-prefix unwrap → numerical isclose (abs_tol=1e-4) with percentage variants → brace/paren strip + lowercase compare → equation-form rewrite (f(x) = yy) → symbolic equivalence via sympy.parsing.sympy_parser.parse_expr and latex2sympy2_extended.latex2sympy).

Symbolic equivalence (e.g. \sqrt{2}2^{1/2}, \frac{1}{3}0.333333, 1,2,33,2,1) requires the [accuracy] install:

$uv pip install 'aiperf[accuracy]'

Without those optional dependencies (sympy, latex2sympy2-extended) the grader falls back to a stdlib normalize + Fraction comparison and emits a single warning the first time it runs. Reference parity with the trt-llm recipe requires the full sympy stack.

When extraction fell back past the \boxed{} step (i.e. the model didn’t follow the boxed-answer instruction), the response is flagged unparsed=True in the per-record output. A correct unparsed response is still scored correct, mirroring multiple_choice’s convention.

Output

Accuracy results are displayed in the console and exported to CSV:

Accuracy Benchmark Results
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Task ┃ Correct ┃ Total ┃ Accuracy ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ abstract_algebra │ 35 │ 100 │ 35.00% │
│ ... │ ... │ ... │ ... │
│ OVERALL │ 8368 │ 14042 │ 59.59% │
└─────────────────────────┴─────────┴───────┴──────────┘

CSV file: <artifact_dir>/accuracy_results.csv

Architecture

AccuracyDatasetLoader → Conversation/Turn objects (dataset pipeline)
AccuracyRecordProcessor → grades each response (record pipeline)
AccuracyResultsProcessor → aggregates per-task accuracy (results pipeline)
AccuracyConsoleExporter → Rich table output
AccuracyDataExporter → CSV export

All components self-disable when --accuracy-benchmark is not set.